What's worse, tricking a woman into pregnancy or baby-trapping a man?

[Anonymous]

Surprisingly men have also done that for ages. More women baby-trap but this is an example of a man doing this, even after the woman didn't want kids:

https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/man-convicted-for-poking-holes-in-condoms-loses-appeal-1.1099713

Is it worse if a man deliberately gets us pregnant without our consent (he wants the baby, it's his plan) than if the woman babytraps him without consent. What's worse? Both of them are doing something in common, bringing a baby without their partner's consent.

Tricking a woman into pregnancy without her consent

Baby-trapping a man without his consent

Both are equally awful. Neither is worse.

[D_Bone_Steak]

Both are fucking horrible and show that they're shit as a possible long-term partner. I voted that they're equally awful.

Here is why I almost voted it's worse for the woman to do it. It's not because of women... it's the legal system that's weaponized those shitty types of women. There is no court case for the woman if she does it... no news article... well... that Drake guy putting hot sauce in his condom, and she fished it out of the trash and put it in her, and then tried to sue him for it... that's pretty close.

Then the baby is basically a money trap for the men. The woman has to be an absurd piece of shit for it to go in the man's favor.

[MicahRaine]

Both are equally wrong.

Why it's worse to baby-trap a woman: Her body has to go through with an abortion (generally costs under $800) or the full child-bearing process (can cost thousands of dollars). But once that's over, it's over and she can either live her life (aborted the child) or put the child up for adoption (birthed the child) and then live her life. Either way, the woman is barely affected within two years.

Why it's worse to baby trap a man: He'll be stuck paying child support for the next EIGHTEEN years.

[avery58]

If anything it might be slightly worse to trick a lady into getting pregnant since her body will have to deal with the process for 9 months and then go into labor, it must be way worse if she wasn't mentally prepared and trying to practice safe sex. But they're pretty much equally as bad. I will say that a women baby-trapping men seems a lot more common though.

[Asker]

Yes I agree. Baby-trapping a man is more common because of the fact that we hace a timeframe for babies (the cases of gfs living years with their man and they already want a family) and seeking child support and security from the man. Even though it's still inexcusable, those are still some reasons.
I have no idea what the man gains be tricking a woman with a pregnancy. Let's say he does that to a woman that doesn't believe in abortion but she doesn't want kids, what would be he gaining from that? Isn't he trapping himself by doing that?

[avery58]

Perhaps he is insecure that she will leave him and that's his desperate way of tying her down

[PeachyPie93]

Both equally wrong, but at least the girl can kill it if she don't want it. The guy would basically need to kill you if he don't want it lol.

[AviatorTom]

Except for the change in sex/gender, both are essentially the same thing. Neither is better, or worse, than the other.

[Anonymous]

baby trapping a man is worse

both outcomes lead to the man having to pay child support whether he wants to or not

women can opt out of parenthood and avoid responsibility

men can't opt out of parenthood and are forced to take responsibility or be locked up

not to mention the MeToo movement is against the man

[DarkLegacy]

Only women do this normally because they get insecure or to trap men. Women will manipulate men by agreeing to something causal and then getting pregnant to trap him. If a woman did that to me then i would drop her of course. There are some cases of men poking holes in condoms.

[Asker]

I get that. Let's suppose a man did this to a woman that doesn't believe in abortion. For what purpose would a man poke holes to impregnant? Why? What is he gaining from doing that? Wouldn't he be trapping himself too?

[DarkLegacy]

Exactly

[idonotlikeyou]

In both cases, the child suffers the most. Both are unacceptable.

[Anonymous]

Almost went with both equal, but I went with tricking a woman is worse because the pregnancy could endanger the woman's body if she is opposed to abortion, while baby-trapping the man would only affect his finances, lifestyle, and mental health (baby-trapping would not pose a physical risk to a cisgender man)

[RavVid]

Both are horrible acts and equally reprehensible.

Overall I think spurgling is a step up worse. If you don't know that is a contraction of sperm and burgling e. g. stealing a used condom.

[Anonymous]

Both are equally awful and is forcing that child to start life at a huge disadvantage.

[Asker]

Yeah the poor kid is the innocent party.

[Opinion Owner]

Absolutely right. Every child deserves two capable/loving parents who can't wait to welcome them into the world.

[SotiCoto]

Local legalities aside, a woman can just go get an abortion. A man cannot force a woman to get an abortion. So the advantage goes to the women here.

[Wiredone]

Both of them are a terrible thing to do. I had a woman try doing that to me until I caught on

[Berethor]

Nowadays it worse when women do it, man just want baby, woman want to steal money.

[NamerOfStars]

A woman who gets pregnant despite her wishes has options; a man doesn't.

[Raaj4you]

Both are equally dangerous. It means these type of men and women are blackmailers.

[genericname85]

baby tricking a man. cause a woman can have an abortion. a man has no way out of the obligation.

[DextroShade]

Women can opt out of parental responsibilities, men can't.

[KrakenAttackin]

Women have a vast number of birth control options.

[teamvic]

No, they're both on equal level

[Danny_dan92]

They’re both bad. Period

[LazerBean]

You already asked this

[Asker]

I don't recall asking it. I do recalled someone else comparing it to stringing along women, which isn't the same. Over here both actually do the same act, just difference in the genders.